enchantedsleeper: Hello Kitty holding a pencil (kitty pencil)
[personal profile] enchantedsleeper
*blows dust off my blog*

Hi, everyone!

You've probably seen or heard the news by now, but if you haven't, yesterday it was revealed that Archive of Our Own had made the final list of nominees for the 2019 Hugo Awards in the category of Best Related Work. Yay, fanfiction!

The fact that this has kicked off some wank probably doesn't come as a surprise to anyone.

You can get a sense of it just by searching for "AO3 Hugo nomination" on Twitter (if you do Twitter), but the tl;dr is that there's some confusion as to whether the Hugo Awards are solely for written literature (they're not - there are categories for Best Dramatic Presentation, Best Fan Artist, and Best Graphic Story among others) and whether the nomination is for the fanfiction on AO3 or AO3 the project/platform. This led to many folks trying to set the record straight by emphasising that AO3 qualifies for the award as a platform and a project built by fan labour - but has also led to some gatekeeping-type comments about who the award is "for" and who "gets" to be happy that AO3 was nominated for a Hugo.

Fanworks creators who have a work published to AO3 want to celebrate being a part of AO3's success (there are lots of jokes going around to the tune of "Well I guess my fics are nominated for a Hugo now" and people updating their bios to read "Hugo nominated") - and they should! The whole point of AO3 is that it was built by fans, for fans, and the entirety of fandom celebrating that is exactly what should happen. People also want to make sure that the volunteer love and labour that goes into running AO3 isn't overlooked. As a volunteer for the OTW myself (I should probably mention that as disclosure), I'm pretty happy about that too.

I think there have also been some derisive comments about how AO3 doesn't merit a Hugo nomination because "ew fanfiction", but frankly those people are just out of touch.

Anyway, it wouldn't be fandom without some wank, but out of the morass of slap-fighting have emerged some truly lovely comments and threads that celebrate fanfiction, fanworks, marginalised creators, and the labour of love that is AO3. So I wanted to round up some of those in a blog post. (Apologies for the crappy formatting - I tried to embed the tweets, but this was the best that Dreamwidth could manage. Click on the date to view the original tweet).

Enjoy, and please add your own suggestions in a comment!

lovingnikiforov
I enjoy this tweet by @lovingnikiforov immensely, because even before I was involved in the OTW and the wider world of fandom, I railed against the people who dismissed fanfiction as childish, badly-written porn. Sure, there's plenty of that about (and not just in fanfiction), but there's so much more than that out there. Fanfic is goddamn art, you guys. Hugo-nominated art.

tehnakki
I have to give @tehnakki props for putting "5.4e-5%" in their name on Twitter 😂 It's just brilliant. That is all.

LeeFlower
While I don't agree that the jokes about fanfic writers being Hugo-nominated in any way detracts from AO3's achievement (and Annalee also clarified that they didn't mean to come across that way), I love this thread by Annalee/@LeeFlower that celebrates how remarkable AO3 is as a female-built and driven web development project, in the context of a very male-dominated industry.

englishmace
@englishmace/Jennifer Mace's thread builds on the original tweet by LeeFlower and goes into more depth about the technical phenomenon that is AO3, including its filters, free-form tagging system, user interface, and the fact that the fans behind it respond to feedback and take it on board. As Jennifer says, "how much Big Tech can say as much these days?"

GretchenAMcC
And again building on the tweet by Jennifer Mace, Gretchen McCulloch celebrates AO3's taxonomy and archiving systems, and points out that academia could stand to learn from fandom. My favourite tweet from further down the thread is where Gretchen comments that, "AO3 has solved tagging using a solution that tech companies generally refuse to consider: "Sounds like a hard problem requiring many subtle judgement calls, let's throw a bunch of humans at it permanently and value them highly""

teaberryblue
This lovely thread by Tea Berry-Blue, a former OTW volunteer and the co-author of the second-most-commented fic on AO3, sums up her feelings regarding AO3's Hugo nomination and the labour of love that is the Archive.

fcoppa
Organization for Transformative Works co-founder Francesca Coppa gives a shout-out to two of her fellow co-founders, Susan Gibel and Rebecca Tushnet, for their roles in creating AO3's user-friendly terms of service, and the fact that the Archive is non-profit, ad-free and data-private.

VMellifera
This thread by @VMellifera eloquently expresses why no-one should talk down to the fanworks creators who are celebrating AO3's success by joking about being "Hugo-nominated" - and why that doesn't diminish the importance of the nomination.

ChuckTingle
I'll let FELLOW HUGO-NOMINATED BUD Chuck Tingle have the last word on this, in his wise and clever response to anyone who suggests that AO3 doesn't deserve a Hugo nomination. CONGRADUTAIONS indeed. xD
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

enchantedsleeper: Hello Kitty holding a pencil (Default)
enchantedsleeper

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 03:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios